Tutorial: optimal piecewise binning with binary target

Basic

To get us started, let’s load a well-known dataset from the UCI repository and transform the data into a pandas.DataFrame.

[1]:
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd

from sklearn.datasets import load_breast_cancer
from sklearn.ensemble import GradientBoostingClassifier
[2]:
data = load_breast_cancer()
df = pd.DataFrame(data.data, columns=data.feature_names)

We choose a variable to discretize and the binary target.

[3]:
variable = "mean radius"
x = df[variable].values
y = data.target

Import and instantiate an OptimalPWBinning object class and we pass the variable name. The OptimalPWBinning can ONLY handle numerical variables. This differs from the OptimalBinning object class.

[4]:
from optbinning import OptimalPWBinning
[5]:
optb = OptimalPWBinning(name=variable)

We fit the optimal binning object with arrays x and y. We set a minimum (lower bound) and maximum (upper bound) probability using arguments lb and ub. Note that these bounds are optional, but guarantee an event rate between \([0, 1]\) as any probability distribution. As shown later, settings these bounds will increase the problem size thus leading to higher solution times. An alternative approach to bypass these bounds is implemented when transforming to event rate or WoE using functions fit and fit_transform, where values outside the interval \([0, 1]\) are clipped.

Note that the Weight-of-Evidence is not defined for event rate equal 0 or 1. Therefore, for small datasets, we recommend modifying the interval \([0, 1]\) with a small value, thus using \([\epsilon, 1 - \epsilon]\).

[6]:
optb.fit(x, y, lb=0.001, ub=0.999)
[6]:
OptimalPWBinning(estimator=LogisticRegression(), name='mean radius')
In a Jupyter environment, please rerun this cell to show the HTML representation or trust the notebook.
On GitHub, the HTML representation is unable to render, please try loading this page with nbviewer.org.

You can check if an optimal solution has been found via the status attribute:

[7]:
optb.status
[7]:
'OPTIMAL'

You can also retrieve the optimal split points via the splits attribute:

[8]:
optb.splits
[8]:
array([11.42500019, 12.32999992, 13.09499979, 13.70499992, 15.04500008,
       16.92500019])

The binning table

The optimal binning algorithms return a binning table; a binning table displays the binned data and several metrics for each bin. Class OptimalPWBinning returns an object PWBinningTable via the binning_table attribute.

[9]:
binning_table = optb.binning_table
[10]:
type(binning_table)
[10]:
optbinning.binning.piecewise.binning_statistics.PWBinningTable

The binning_table is instantiated, but not built. Therefore, the first step is to call the method build, which returns a pandas.DataFrame.

[11]:
binning_table.build()
[11]:
Bin Count Count (%) Non-event Event c0 c1
0 (-inf, 11.43) 118 0.207381 3 115 1.032597 -0.004813
1 [11.43, 12.33) 79 0.138840 3 76 1.644465 -0.058368
2 [12.33, 13.09) 68 0.119508 7 61 2.140581 -0.098604
3 [13.09, 13.70) 49 0.086116 10 39 2.915209 -0.157759
4 [13.70, 15.05) 83 0.145870 28 55 4.107004 -0.244719
5 [15.05, 16.93) 54 0.094903 44 10 3.562027 -0.208496
6 [16.93, inf) 118 0.207381 117 1 0.081993 -0.002881
7 Special 0 0.000000 0 0 0.0 0.0
8 Missing 0 0.000000 0 0 0.0 0.0
Totals 569 1.000000 212 357 - -

Let’s describe the columns of this binning table:

  • Bin: the intervals delimited by the optimal split points.

  • Count: the number of records for each bin.

  • Count (%): the percentage of records for each bin.

  • Non-event: the number of non-event records \((y = 0)\) for each bin.

  • Event: the number of event records \((y = 1)\) for each bin.

  • \(c_0\): the first coefficient of the event rate polynomial.

  • \(c_1\): the second coefficient of the event rate polynomial.

The event rate for bin \(i\) is defined as \(ER_i = c_0 + c_1 x_i\), where \(x_i \in \text{Bin}_{i}\). In general, \begin{equation} ER_i = \sum_{j=0}^d c_j x_i^j, \end{equation} where \(d\) is the degree of the event rate polynomial.

The last row shows the total number of records, non-event records, event records.

You can use the method plot to visualize the number of non-event and event records by bin, and WoE or event rate curve.

[12]:
binning_table.plot(metric="woe")
../_images/tutorials_tutorial_piecewise_binary_24_0.png
[13]:
binning_table.plot(metric="event_rate")
../_images/tutorials_tutorial_piecewise_binary_25_0.png

Event rate / WoE transformation

Now that we have checked the binned data, we can transform our original data into WoE or event rate values.

[14]:
x_transform_woe = optb.transform(x, metric="woe")
[15]:
x_transform_event_rate = optb.transform(x, metric="event_rate")

Advanced

Optimal binning Information

The OptimalPWBinning can print overview information about the options settings, problem statistics, and the solution of the computation. By default, print_level=1.

[16]:
optb = OptimalPWBinning(name=variable)
optb.fit(x, y)
[16]:
OptimalPWBinning(estimator=LogisticRegression(), name='mean radius')
In a Jupyter environment, please rerun this cell to show the HTML representation or trust the notebook.
On GitHub, the HTML representation is unable to render, please try loading this page with nbviewer.org.

If print_level=0, a minimal output including the header, variable name, status, and total time are printed.

[17]:
optb.information(print_level=0)
optbinning (Version 1.0.0)
Copyright (c) 2019-2026 Guillermo Navas-Palencia, Apache License 2.0

  Name    : mean radius
  Status  : OPTIMAL

  Time    : 0.5454  sec

If print_level>=1, statistics on the pre-binning phase and the solver are printed. More detailed timing statistics are also included.

[18]:
optb.information(print_level=1)
optbinning (Version 1.0.0)
Copyright (c) 2019-2026 Guillermo Navas-Palencia, Apache License 2.0

  Name    : mean radius
  Status  : OPTIMAL

  Pre-binning statistics
    Number of bins                         7

  Solver statistics
    Type                                auto
    Number of variables                   14
    Number of constraints                 20

  Timing
    Total time                          0.55 sec
    Pre-processing                      0.00 sec   (  0.06%)
    Estimator                           0.15 sec   ( 26.87%)
    Pre-binning                         0.21 sec   ( 38.29%)
    Solver                              0.16 sec   ( 30.09%)
    Post-processing                     0.02 sec   (  4.49%)

If print_level=2, the list of all options of the OptimalBinning are displayed.

[19]:
optb.information(print_level=2)
optbinning (Version 1.0.0)
Copyright (c) 2019-2026 Guillermo Navas-Palencia, Apache License 2.0

  Begin options
    name                         mean radius   * U
    estimator                            yes   * U
    objective                             l2   * d
    degree                                 1   * d
    continuous                          True   * d
    prebinning_method                   cart   * d
    max_n_prebins                         20   * d
    min_prebin_size                     0.05   * d
    min_n_bins                            no   * d
    max_n_bins                            no   * d
    min_bin_size                          no   * d
    max_bin_size                          no   * d
    monotonic_trend                     auto   * d
    n_subsamples                          no   * d
    max_pvalue                            no   * d
    max_pvalue_policy            consecutive   * d
    outlier_detector                      no   * d
    outlier_params                        no   * d
    user_splits                           no   * d
    special_codes                         no   * d
    split_digits                          no   * d
    solver                              auto   * d
    h_epsilon                           1.35   * d
    quantile                             0.5   * d
    regularization                        no   * d
    reg_l1                               1.0   * d
    reg_l2                               1.0   * d
    random_state                          no   * d
    verbose                            False   * d
  End options

  Name    : mean radius
  Status  : OPTIMAL

  Pre-binning statistics
    Number of bins                         7

  Solver statistics
    Type                                auto
    Number of variables                   14
    Number of constraints                 20

  Timing
    Total time                          0.55 sec
    Pre-processing                      0.00 sec   (  0.06%)
    Estimator                           0.15 sec   ( 26.87%)
    Pre-binning                         0.21 sec   ( 38.29%)
    Solver                              0.16 sec   ( 30.09%)
    Post-processing                     0.02 sec   (  4.49%)

Binning table statistical analysis

The analysis method performs a statistical analysis of the binning table, computing the statistics Gini index, Information Value (IV), Jensen-Shannon divergence, and the quality score. Additionally, several statistical significance tests between consecutive bins of the contingency table are performed: a frequentist test using the Chi-square test or the Fisher’s exact test, and a Bayesian A/B test using the beta distribution as a conjugate prior of the Bernoulli distribution. The piecewise binning also includes two performance metrics: the average precision and the Brier score.

[20]:
binning_table.analysis(pvalue_test="chi2")
---------------------------------------------
OptimalBinning: Binary Binning Table Analysis
---------------------------------------------

  General metrics

    Gini index               0.87503303
    IV (Jeffrey)             4.48034999
    JS (Jensen-Shannon)      0.37576960
    Hellinger                0.44284048
    Triangular               1.20890940
    KS                       0.72390466
    Avg precision            0.95577179
    Brier score              0.08956359
    HHI                      0.15727342
    HHI (normalized)         0.01681899
    Cramer's V               0.80066760
    Quality score            0.00000000

  Significance tests

    Bin A  Bin B  t-statistic      p-value  P[A > B]     P[B > A]
        0      1     0.289789 5.903557e-01  0.697563 3.024368e-01
        1      2     2.285355 1.306002e-01  0.941469 5.853092e-02
        2      3     2.317546 1.279217e-01  0.936661 6.333919e-02
        3      4     2.539025 1.110634e-01  0.950869 4.913141e-02
        4      5    29.418844 5.830790e-08  1.000000 1.898159e-11
        5      6    18.624518 1.591604e-05  0.999997 3.106835e-06

[21]:
binning_table.analysis(pvalue_test="fisher")
---------------------------------------------
OptimalBinning: Binary Binning Table Analysis
---------------------------------------------

  General metrics

    Gini index               0.87503303
    IV (Jeffrey)             4.48034999
    JS (Jensen-Shannon)      0.37576960
    Hellinger                0.44284048
    Triangular               1.20890940
    KS                       0.72390466
    Avg precision            0.95577179
    Brier score              0.08956359
    HHI                      0.15727342
    HHI (normalized)         0.01681899
    Cramer's V               0.80066760
    Quality score            0.00000000

  Significance tests

    Bin A  Bin B  odd ratio      p-value  P[A > B]     P[B > A]
        0      1   0.660870 6.855009e-01  0.697563 3.024368e-01
        1      2   0.343985 1.879769e-01  0.941469 5.853092e-02
        2      3   0.447541 1.829850e-01  0.936661 6.333919e-02
        3      4   0.503663 1.153088e-01  0.950869 4.913141e-02
        4      5   0.115702 3.464724e-08  1.000000 1.898148e-11
        5      6   0.037607 4.144258e-05  0.999997 3.106835e-06

Event rate / WoE monotonicity

The monotonic_trend option permits forcing a monotonic trend to the event rate curve. The default setting “auto” should be the preferred option, however, some business constraints might require to impose different trends. The default setting “auto” chooses the monotonic trend most likely to maximize the information value from the options “ascending”, “descending”, “peak” and “valley” using a machine-learning-based classifier. For this example, we choose Gradient Boosting as an estimator.

[22]:
variable = "mean texture"
x = df[variable].values
y = data.target
[23]:
optb = OptimalPWBinning(name=variable, estimator=GradientBoostingClassifier())
optb.fit(x, y, lb=0.001, ub=0.999)
[23]:
OptimalPWBinning(estimator=GradientBoostingClassifier(), name='mean texture')
In a Jupyter environment, please rerun this cell to show the HTML representation or trust the notebook.
On GitHub, the HTML representation is unable to render, please try loading this page with nbviewer.org.
[24]:
binning_table = optb.binning_table
binning_table.build()
[24]:
Bin Count Count (%) Non-event Event c0 c1
0 (-inf, 15.05) 92 0.161687 4 88 0.931559 -0.0
1 [15.05, 16.39) 61 0.107206 8 53 2.075855 -0.076058
2 [16.39, 17.03) 29 0.050967 6 23 2.149387 -0.080543
3 [17.03, 18.46) 79 0.138840 17 62 1.113762 -0.019749
4 [18.46, 19.47) 55 0.096661 20 35 4.139988 -0.183684
5 [19.47, 20.20) 36 0.063269 18 18 4.417909 -0.197958
6 [20.20, 21.71) 72 0.126538 43 29 0.933399 -0.025415
7 [21.71, 22.74) 40 0.070299 27 13 2.611221 -0.102698
8 [22.74, 24.00) 29 0.050967 24 5 0.275868 -0.0
9 [24.00, 26.98) 43 0.075571 30 13 -1.111301 0.057799
10 [26.98, inf) 33 0.057996 15 18 0.448108 0.0
11 Special 0 0.000000 0 0 0.0 0.0
12 Missing 0 0.000000 0 0 0.0 0.0
Totals 569 1.000000 212 357 - -
[25]:
binning_table.plot(metric="event_rate")
../_images/tutorials_tutorial_piecewise_binary_49_0.png

For example, we can force the variable mean texture to be convex with respect to the probability of having breast cancer.

[26]:
optb = OptimalPWBinning(name=variable, estimator=GradientBoostingClassifier(),
                        monotonic_trend="convex")
optb.fit(x, y, lb=0.001, ub=0.999)
[26]:
OptimalPWBinning(estimator=GradientBoostingClassifier(),
                 monotonic_trend='convex', name='mean texture')
In a Jupyter environment, please rerun this cell to show the HTML representation or trust the notebook.
On GitHub, the HTML representation is unable to render, please try loading this page with nbviewer.org.
[27]:
binning_table = optb.binning_table
binning_table.build()
binning_table.plot(metric="event_rate")
../_images/tutorials_tutorial_piecewise_binary_52_0.png

User-defined split points

In some situations, we have defined split points or bins required to satisfy a priori belief, knowledge or business constraint. The OptimalPWBinning permits to pass user-defined split points. The supplied information is used as a pre-binning, disallowing any pre-binning method set by the user. Furthermore, version 0.5.0 introduces user_splits_fixed parameter, to allow the user to fix some user-defined splits, so these must appear in the solution.

Example numerical variable:

[28]:
user_splits =       [  14,    15,    16,    17,    20,    21,    22,    27]
user_splits_fixed = [False, True,  True, False, False, False, False, False]
[29]:
optb = OptimalPWBinning(name=variable, user_splits=user_splits,
                        user_splits_fixed=user_splits_fixed)

optb.fit(x, y)
[29]:
OptimalPWBinning(estimator=LogisticRegression(), name='mean texture',
                 user_splits=[14, 15, 16, 17, 20, 21, 22, 27],
                 user_splits_fixed=[False, True, True, False, False, False,
                                    False, False])
In a Jupyter environment, please rerun this cell to show the HTML representation or trust the notebook.
On GitHub, the HTML representation is unable to render, please try loading this page with nbviewer.org.
[30]:
binning_table = optb.binning_table
binning_table.build()
[30]:
Bin Count Count (%) Non-event Event c0 c1
0 (-inf, 14.00) 54 0.094903 2 52 1.154009 -0.020568
1 [14.00, 15.00) 37 0.065026 2 35 1.353911 -0.034847
2 [15.00, 16.00) 43 0.075571 7 36 1.247073 -0.027724
3 [16.00, 20.00) 210 0.369069 59 151 1.569012 -0.047846
4 [20.00, 21.00) 45 0.079086 26 19 1.937899 -0.06629
5 [21.00, 22.00) 49 0.086116 30 19 1.54374 -0.047521
6 [22.00, 27.00) 99 0.173989 71 28 1.893766 -0.063431
7 [27.00, inf) 32 0.056239 15 17 0.181134 0.0
8 Special 0 0.000000 0 0 0.0 0.0
9 Missing 0 0.000000 0 0 0.0 0.0
Totals 569 1.000000 212 357 - -
[31]:
optb.information()
optbinning (Version 1.0.0)
Copyright (c) 2019-2026 Guillermo Navas-Palencia, Apache License 2.0

  Name    : mean texture
  Status  : OPTIMAL

  Pre-binning statistics
    Number of bins                         8

  Solver statistics
    Type                                auto
    Number of variables                   16
    Number of constraints                 23

  Timing
    Total time                          0.16 sec
    Pre-processing                      0.00 sec   (  0.63%)
    Estimator                           0.02 sec   ( 11.38%)
    Pre-binning                         0.08 sec   ( 54.53%)
    Solver                              0.03 sec   ( 19.61%)
    Post-processing                     0.02 sec   ( 12.95%)

Performance: choosing a solver

OptimalPWBinning uses the RoPWR library to solving the piecewise regression problem. See https://github.com/guillermo-navas-palencia/ropwr for details.

Robustness: choosing an objective function and regularization

OptimalPWBinning uses the RoPWR library to solving the piecewise regression problem. See https://github.com/guillermo-navas-palencia/ropwr for details.

Missing data and special codes

For this example, let’s load data from the FICO Explainable Machine Learning Challenge: https://community.fico.com/s/explainable-machine-learning-challenge

[32]:
df = pd.read_csv("data/FICO_challenge/heloc_dataset_v1.csv", sep=",")

The data dictionary of this challenge includes three special values/codes:

  • -9 No Bureau Record or No Investigation

  • -8 No Usable/Valid Trades or Inquiries

  • -7 Condition not Met (e.g. No Inquiries, No Delinquencies)

Version 0.16.0 added support to treat special codes separately.

[33]:
special_codes = {'special_9': -9, 'special_8': -8, 'special_7': -7}
[34]:
variable = "AverageMInFile"
x = df[variable].values.copy()
y = df.RiskPerformance.values
[35]:
df.RiskPerformance.unique()
[35]:
<StringArray>
['Bad', 'Good']
Length: 2, dtype: str

Target is a categorical dichotomic variable, which can be easily transform into numerical.

[36]:
mask = y == "Bad"
y = mask.astype(int)
[37]:
x[10:20] = -8
x[100:105] = -7

For the sake of completeness, we include a few missing values

[38]:
idx = np.random.randint(0, len(x), 500)
x = x.astype(float)
x[idx] = np.nan
[39]:
optb = OptimalPWBinning(name=variable, special_codes=special_codes, solver="osqp")

optb.fit(x, y, lb=0, ub=1)
[39]:
OptimalPWBinning(estimator=LogisticRegression(), name='AverageMInFile',
                 solver='osqp',
                 special_codes={'special_7': -7, 'special_8': -8,
                                'special_9': -9})
In a Jupyter environment, please rerun this cell to show the HTML representation or trust the notebook.
On GitHub, the HTML representation is unable to render, please try loading this page with nbviewer.org.
[40]:
optb.information(print_level=1)
optbinning (Version 1.0.0)
Copyright (c) 2019-2026 Guillermo Navas-Palencia, Apache License 2.0

  Name    : AverageMInFile
  Status  : OPTIMAL

  Pre-binning statistics
    Number of bins                        12

  Solver statistics
    Type                                osqp
    Number of variables                   24
    Number of constraints                 39

  Timing
    Total time                          0.34 sec
    Pre-processing                      0.00 sec   (  1.19%)
    Estimator                           0.05 sec   ( 13.51%)
    Pre-binning                         0.21 sec   ( 61.24%)
    Solver                              0.03 sec   (  9.04%)
    Post-processing                     0.05 sec   ( 14.15%)

[41]:
binning_table = optb.binning_table
binning_table.build()
[41]:
Bin Count Count (%) Non-event Event c0 c1
0 (-inf, 30.50) 548 0.052395 95 453 0.791991 -0.003076
1 [30.50, 41.50) 549 0.052491 148 401 0.804109 -0.003473
2 [41.50, 48.50) 510 0.048762 146 364 0.808176 -0.003571
3 [48.50, 54.50) 525 0.050196 180 345 0.813653 -0.003684
4 [54.50, 59.50) 483 0.046180 198 285 0.817621 -0.003757
5 [59.50, 64.50) 602 0.057558 261 341 0.819753 -0.003793
6 [64.50, 69.50) 648 0.061956 299 349 0.826993 -0.003905
7 [69.50, 74.50) 679 0.064920 324 355 0.812736 -0.0037
8 [74.50, 80.50) 770 0.073621 400 370 0.870012 -0.004469
9 [80.50, 97.50) 1816 0.173630 1029 787 0.777589 -0.003321
10 [97.50, 116.50) 1173 0.112152 719 454 1.0448 -0.006061
11 [116.50, inf) 1092 0.104408 708 384 0.486695 -0.001271
12 special_9 560 0.053542 253 307 0.548214 0.0
13 special_8 10 0.000956 2 8 0.8 0.0
14 special_7 5 0.000478 2 3 0.6 0.0
15 Missing 489 0.046754 236 253 0.517382 0.0
Totals 10459 1.000000 5000 5459 - -

Note the dashed bins 10 and 11, corresponding to the special codes bin and the missing bin, respectively.

[42]:
binning_table.plot(metric="event_rate")
../_images/tutorials_tutorial_piecewise_binary_81_0.png

Verbosity option

For debugging purposes, we can print information on each step of the computation by triggering the verbose option.

[43]:
optb = OptimalPWBinning(name=variable, solver="osqp", verbose=True)
optb.fit(x, y, lb=0, ub=1)
2026-09-12 18:33:41,517 | INFO : Optimal piecewise binning started.
2026-09-12 18:33:41,520 | INFO : Options: check parameters.
2026-09-12 18:33:41,522 | INFO : Pre-processing started.
2026-09-12 18:33:41,523 | INFO : Pre-processing: number of samples: 10459
2026-09-12 18:33:41,526 | INFO : Pre-processing: number of clean samples: 9970
2026-09-12 18:33:41,527 | INFO : Pre-processing: number of missing samples: 489
2026-09-12 18:33:41,529 | INFO : Pre-processing: number of special samples: 0
2026-09-12 18:33:41,534 | INFO : Pre-processing terminated. Time: 0.0007s
2026-09-12 18:33:41,536 | INFO : Pre-binning: set logistic regression as an estimator.
2026-09-12 18:33:41,538 | INFO : Pre-binning: estimator fitting started.
2026-09-12 18:33:41,588 | INFO : Pre-binning: estimator terminated. Time 0.0517s.
2026-09-12 18:33:41,590 | INFO : Pre-binning: optimal binning started.
2026-09-12 18:33:41,726 | INFO : Pre-binning: number of splits: 8.
2026-09-12 18:33:41,728 | INFO : Pre-binning: no need for subsamples.
2026-09-12 18:33:41,729 | INFO : Pre-binning: optimal binning terminated. Time 0.1366s.
2026-09-12 18:33:41,731 | INFO : Optimizer started.
2026-09-12 18:33:41,735 | INFO : Optimizer: descending monotonic trend.
(CVXPY) Sep 12 06:33:41 PM: Your problem has 18 variables, 30 constraints, and 0 parameters.
(CVXPY) Sep 12 06:33:41 PM: It is compliant with the following grammars: DCP, DQCP
(CVXPY) Sep 12 06:33:41 PM: DCP verification time: 0.0003 seconds.
(CVXPY) Sep 12 06:33:41 PM: Expression tree has 4 nodes.
(CVXPY) Sep 12 06:33:41 PM: (If you need to solve this problem multiple times, but with different data, consider using parameters.)
(CVXPY) Sep 12 06:33:41 PM: CVXPY will first compile your problem; then, it will invoke a numerical solver to obtain a solution.
(CVXPY) Sep 12 06:33:41 PM: Your problem is compiled with the CPP canonicalization backend.
(CVXPY) Sep 12 06:33:41 PM: Compiling problem (target solver=OSQP).
(CVXPY) Sep 12 06:33:41 PM: Reduction chain: Dcp2Cone -> CvxAttr2Constr -> EliminateZeroSized -> ConeMatrixStuffing -> OSQP
(CVXPY) Sep 12 06:33:41 PM: Applying reduction Dcp2Cone
(CVXPY) Sep 12 06:33:41 PM: Applying reduction CvxAttr2Constr
(CVXPY) Sep 12 06:33:41 PM: Applying reduction EliminateZeroSized
(CVXPY) Sep 12 06:33:41 PM: Applying reduction ConeMatrixStuffing
(CVXPY) Sep 12 06:33:41 PM: Applying reduction OSQP
===============================================================================
                                     CVXPY
                                     v1.9.2
===============================================================================
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  Compilation
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CVXPY) Sep 12 06:33:41 PM: Finished problem compilation (took 5.283e-02 seconds).
(CVXPY) Sep 12 06:33:41 PM: Invoking solver OSQP  to obtain a solution.
(CVXPY) Sep 12 06:33:41 PM: Problem status: optimal
(CVXPY) Sep 12 06:33:41 PM: Optimal value: -2.827e+03
(CVXPY) Sep 12 06:33:41 PM: Compilation took 5.283e-02 seconds
(CVXPY) Sep 12 06:33:41 PM: Solver (including time spent in interface) took 7.961e-03 seconds
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                Numerical solver
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
           OSQP v1.0.0  -  Operator Splitting QP Solver
              (c) The OSQP Developer Team
-----------------------------------------------------------------
problem:  variables n = 18, constraints m = 30
          nnz(P) + nnz(A) = 76
settings: algebra = Built-in,
          OSQPInt = 4 bytes, OSQPFloat = 8 bytes,
          linear system solver = QDLDL v0.1.8,
          eps_abs = 1.0e-05, eps_rel = 1.0e-05,
          eps_prim_inf = 1.0e-04, eps_dual_inf = 1.0e-04,
          rho = 1.00e-01 (adaptive: 50 iterations),
          sigma = 1.00e-06, alpha = 1.60, max_iter = 10000
          check_termination: on (interval 25, duality gap: on),
          time_limit: 1.00e+10 sec,
          scaling: on (10 iterations), scaled_termination: off
          warm starting: on, polishing: on,
iter   objective    prim res   dual res   gap        rel kkt    rho         time
   1  -1.9836e+03   6.62e-03   9.22e+04   4.27e+03   9.22e+04   1.00e-01    1.36e-04s
  75  -2.8271e+03   3.48e-06   1.22e+00  -1.08e-03   1.22e+00   1.00e-01    3.09e-04s
plsh  -2.8271e+03   1.13e-16   4.45e-11  -8.53e-13   4.45e-11   --------    6.00e-04s

status:               solved
solution polishing:   successful
number of iterations: 75
optimal objective:    -2827.0522
dual objective:       -2827.0522
duality gap:          -8.5324e-13
primal-dual integral: 4.2741e+03
run time:             6.00e-04s
optimal rho estimate: 2.74e-02

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    Summary
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2026-09-12 18:33:41,857 | INFO : Optimizer terminated. Time: 0.1201s
2026-09-12 18:33:41,868 | INFO : Post-processing started.
2026-09-12 18:33:41,871 | INFO : Post-processing: compute binning information.
2026-09-12 18:33:41,878 | INFO : Post-processing: compute performance metrics.
2026-09-12 18:33:41,916 | INFO : Post-processing terminated. Time: 0.0437s
2026-09-12 18:33:41,918 | INFO : Optimal piecewise binning terminated. Status: OPTIMAL. Time: 0.4008s
[43]:
OptimalPWBinning(estimator=LogisticRegression(), name='AverageMInFile',
                 solver='osqp', verbose=True)
In a Jupyter environment, please rerun this cell to show the HTML representation or trust the notebook.
On GitHub, the HTML representation is unable to render, please try loading this page with nbviewer.org.